<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Euro-elections 2009 Part III: BNP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingstontorycllr.net/2009/05/25/euro-elections-2009-part-iii-bnp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingstontorycllr.net/2009/05/25/euro-elections-2009-part-iii-bnp/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on politics, sport, the universe and everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljohnston</title>
		<link>http://kingstontorycllr.net/2009/05/25/euro-elections-2009-part-iii-bnp/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pauljohnston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljohnston.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may be right about the BNP, I certainly wouldn&#039;t argue the toss with you over that.

As for UKIP, &#039;despise&#039; is perhaps too strong a word. @Distrust&#039; would be nearer the mark. 

I speak the truth as I see it and the truth I see about UKIP is as I have stated. Supporting it is essentially the most effective means yet devised of ensuring the failure of its stated aim. Why on earth do you think Blair and Brown looked so benignly on it in 2004? Why did and does the BBC? Why the media silence on what happened with UKIP MEPs after 2004? And what is a party supporting UK separation from Europe doing promoting a non-British candidate in a British constituency - however personally excellent Ms Andreasson is?

Please take a look at it square on and take a look at the website link I gave you. And my very best wishes to you and yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right about the BNP, I certainly wouldn&#8217;t argue the toss with you over that.</p>
<p>As for UKIP, &#8216;despise&#8217; is perhaps too strong a word. @Distrust&#8217; would be nearer the mark. </p>
<p>I speak the truth as I see it and the truth I see about UKIP is as I have stated. Supporting it is essentially the most effective means yet devised of ensuring the failure of its stated aim. Why on earth do you think Blair and Brown looked so benignly on it in 2004? Why did and does the BBC? Why the media silence on what happened with UKIP MEPs after 2004? And what is a party supporting UK separation from Europe doing promoting a non-British candidate in a British constituency &#8211; however personally excellent Ms Andreasson is?</p>
<p>Please take a look at it square on and take a look at the website link I gave you. And my very best wishes to you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://kingstontorycllr.net/2009/05/25/euro-elections-2009-part-iii-bnp/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauljohnston.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BNP has hijacked the Spitfire? The BNP would have been interned in World War Two for fascist sympathies. Unlike UKIP whom you have decided to despise.
Better Off Out! Vote UKIP 4th June.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BNP has hijacked the Spitfire? The BNP would have been interned in World War Two for fascist sympathies. Unlike UKIP whom you have decided to despise.<br />
Better Off Out! Vote UKIP 4th June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

